Aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas with a remnant tubercle and a cleft of the anterior arch.

Clinical Cases 04.05.2009
Scan Image
Section: Musculoskeletal system
Case Type: Clinical Cases
Patient: 31 years, male
Authors: Courcoutsakis N, Spanoudaki A, Astrinakis E, Kozadinos A, Prassopoulos P.Department of radiology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School of Thrace, Greece.
icon
Details
icon
AI Report

Clinical History

Cycling athlete, referred head injury.

Imaging Findings

A 31 year old Caucasian male - a cycling athlete - was admitted to the hospital after neck and head injury. Physical examination of the cervical spine, as well as neurologic examination, was normal. The lateral radiograph revealed an interrupted posterior arch of the atlas and presence of a posterior remnant (Fig 1). This was initially misinterpreted as a fracture, but a more detailed inspection showed that the defect had sclerotic borders. CT revealed the absence of ossification of both posterior arches of the atlas, the presence of an intact posterior tubercle and also demonstrated a cleft in the anterior arch (Fig 2,3). There was no soft tissue involvement or bony injury.

Discussion

Atlas vertebra consists of an anterior and a posterior arch, each of which has a tubercle and a lateral mass. During embryonic period, atlas develops from three ossification centres, one mid-line anterior centre which forms the anterior arch and two lateral centres for each lateral mass [1,2]. The ossification centre for the anterior arch and tubercle is unified with the lateral masses at 5-9 years of age [2,3]. The posterior arch is created by perichondral growth unification of two lateral masses centres by 3-5years [1,2,3]. However, in 2% of the population a 4th centre forms the posterior tubercle [4]. Congenital anterior defect cleft vertebra is due to variation or absence of the anterior ossification centre and failure for the lateral masses to fuse anteriorly [5]. Congenital posterior arch abnormalities range from small clefts to complete absence. Developmental deficiencies of the posterior arch imply a defective or absent cartilaginous preformation and not a disturbance of the ossification [1,2,6]. Consequently, bony deficits are bridged by loose connective tissue instead of cartilage [6]. Most atlas anomalies produce no abnormal craniovertebral junction relationships and are not associated with platybasia. The reported incidences are 4% for posterior and 1% for anterior arch defects [2,6]. Abnormalities associated with absence of the posterior arch may be fusion of the vertebra C2-C4 (Klippel-Feil syndrome) and prominence of the posterior tubercle of the axis, bilateral clefts of the axis and an elongated articular process of C3 [2]. Hypoplastic posterior arch of the atlas may be seen in children with Down syndrome, in association with atlantoaxial dislocation, amplifying the risk of spinal cord damage.
According to Currarino et al [1], posterior arch defects are divided into five groups: Type A results from failure of the posterior mid-line fusion of the two hemiarches and accounts more than 90% of all posterior arch defects; type B includes unilateral clefts, ranging from a small cleft to the complete absence of the hemi-arch; type C corresponds to bilateral clefts; type D, as in our case, includes absence of the posterior arch associated with a persistent posterior tubercle. Finally, type E refers to absence of the entire posterior arch including the posterior tubercle, often associated with hypertrophy of the spinous process of C2. In most cases these defects are disclosed incidentally in patients having cervical spine radiographs, usually after trauma. The main clinical implication includes potential misdiagnosis as fractures [3]. Quadriparesis following minor cervical or head trauma and Lehrmitte sign may be seen in a minority of patients with posterior arch aplasia and it is attributed to an impingement of the tubercle on the spinal cord during extension [3,4,6]. In the presence of neurological symptoms, MRI may reveal cord contusion [3].
The congenital clefts, as opposed to fractures, have smooth and sclerotic borders on radiographs, without soft tissue swelling. CT imaging with a 3D reconstruction is extremely helpful in demonstrating these spinal anomalies.

Differential Diagnosis List

Bilateral atlas posterior arch aplasia, remnant tubercle, anterior arch cleft.

Final Diagnosis

Bilateral atlas posterior arch aplasia, remnant tubercle, anterior arch cleft.

Liscense

Figures

Lateral radiograph of the cervical spine

icon
Lateral radiograph of the cervical spine

Axial CT of the atlas

icon
Axial CT of the atlas

3-D reconstruction of the atlas

icon
3-D reconstruction of the atlas