Bilateral Double-Layered Patella (DLP) with supra-patellar impingement

Clinical Cases 17.01.2017
Scan Image
Section: Musculoskeletal system
Case Type: Clinical Cases
Patient: 22 years, male
Authors: João Araujo; Carlos Macedo; Ana Alves; João Amorim; João Oliveira
icon
Details
icon
AI Report

Clinical History

The authors present a case of a 22-year-old man complaining of anterior knee pain and no history of trauma.

Imaging Findings

A computed tomography (CT) and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed demonstrating two patellar layers, one anterior and one posterior, on both knees, confirming the diagnosis of bilateral DLP (Figure 1 and 2). In this case, cartilage tissue was found between the two layers and there was no significant condropathy (Figure 3 and 4).
The anterior osseous patellar layer attached to the extensor mechanism.
On MRI with fat suppression on DLP (Figure 4), both knees show a fluid like signal and abnormal convex posterior margin replacing the normal suprapatellar fat pad. These imagiological findings suggest suprapatellar impingement which was assumed to be the cause of the pain.
An all body x-ray was also performed and there were no signs suggesting association with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED).

Discussion

The DLP is a rare entity [1] that consists of two distinct patellar layers, one being anterior and one posterior.
The literature admits frequent association of DLP with autosomal recessive form of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED) [2, 3]. An all body x-ray should be performed to exclude signs of MED.
Patients with DLP may be asymptomatic and the abnormally is often discovered incidentally on X-ray or CT studies. However, when the interface between the two layers is unstable, it can cause pain and sensation of subluxation. The abnormality of the normal patellar anatomy can affect the extensor mechanism and, although we didn't find any literature to support this statement, having this case in mind, we believe it can cause inflammation of the suprapatellar fat pad.
X-ray, CT and MRI are the main diagnostic imaging studies for this pathology, with the x-ray and the CT playing important roles in the characterization and identification of the two layers. On the other hand, MRI has an important role in the characterization of the cartilage and the soft tissue involvement.
Imaging techniques are important to rule out other differential diagnosis, such as multipartite patella and old frature, because they demonstrate the orientation of the two bone patellar layers. In addition, MRI is helpful to confirm the presence of cartilage.
Due to the rare incidence of this syndrome, its treatment is not standardized. However, when pain is an important complain, surgical approach with fusion between the two layers has been an option [1].

Differential Diagnosis List

Bilateral double layered patella
Bipartite patella
Old fracture

Final Diagnosis

Bilateral double layered patella

Figures

axial CT- bone window

icon
axial CT- bone window

Sagittal T1 and T2* MRI:Left knee

icon
Sagittal T1 and T2* MRI:Left knee
icon
Sagittal T1 and T2* MRI:Left knee

sagittal proton density with fat suppression FSE MRI- Left knee

icon
sagittal proton density with fat suppression FSE MRI- Left knee

Axial gradient echo FS MRI imaging- left knee

icon
Axial gradient echo FS MRI imaging- left knee