An 80-year-old female patient presented with a four-month history of painful right total hip replacement. She had restricted hip movements and pain on weight bearing. Patient had history of hospital admission for urosepsis prior to presentation. Imaging confirmed infected total hip replacement. She was treated with two-stage hip revision surgery.
Fig. 1: Initial post-operative radiographs following Hip replacement shows a cemented total hip replacement with no evidence periosteal reaction, or lysis suggesting infection.
Fig.2: The radiographs following urosepsis demonstrated periosteal reaction and irregularity of the femoral cortex along with translucent areas around the acetabulum. These findings on radiographs indicate evidence of infection and loosening.
Fig.3 (Indium-111) White cell label scan of the hip shows increased uptake around the stem and acetabular components in the delayed phase. This confirms the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection.
The most common causes of painful hip replacement are aseptic loosening or instability. [1] The aseptic loosening usually happens over 10-15 years following the life span of hip replacements. The painful hip following infection is common in the early stages after hip replacement. Late presentation is not common, and usually associated with secondary infection. [2] Urosepsis was the source of infection in our case.
In aseptic loosening, the radiographs show osteolysis around the hip prosthesis, between the bone and cement or cement and implant. However, there wouldn’t be any signs of periosteal reaction, which is suggestive of infection.
Indium labelled white cell scan, shows an increased uptake of Indium-111 around the acetabulum and femoral stem confirming a peri-prosthetic infection. This is represented by the white patches on the scan.
The diagnosis of an infected hip replacement is made by the combination of clinical, biochemical and radiological findings. The clinical features include pain, swelling, erythema, and effusions. The biochemical tests show raised inflammatory markers. The radiographs, white cell scan and on occasions SPECT scan confirms the infection. [3,4]
The pain from peri-prosthetic joint infections are caused by the release of inflammatory mediators by macrophages within the joint and the direct action by macrophages that stimulates osteoclasts to initiate bone resorption. This causes the loosening of the prosthesis. [4]
Our patient presented with hip pain two months following the urosepsis. The hip infection was confirmed with radiographs and white cell scan. The hip aspiration grew same organism that caused urosepsis suggesting the bacteraemia during the urosepsis is the source of infection. She underwent successful two stage revision hip replacement. [5]
Revision hip arthroplasty is the gold standard treatment for an infected hip replacement as there is a 90% eradication of infection. The first stage revision includes debridement of infected tissue and bone, removal of all components and adding an antibiotic loaded cement spacer. The patient is also given systemic antibiotics in conjunction for six weeks and then an antibiotic free period to ensure the removal of the infection. Then once blood serum and inflammatory markers are assessed, a second stage revision with debridement, removal of cement spacer and insertion of the prosthetic joint. [6,7]
Take home message –
Delayed peri-prosthetic joint infections caused by secondary infections. The radiographs and indium-labelled white cell scan have important role in diagnosing the infection. These infections are treated with two-stage revision surgery as gold standard.
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
Urosepsis leading to infected total hip replacement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on the provided patient X-ray imaging, there are clear signs of loosening around the right hip replacement prosthesis, characterized by uneven bone density, bone resorption around the prosthesis, and widening of the interface in certain areas. No obvious acute fracture lines are observed; however, a potential radiolucent zone can be seen at the bone interface near the proximal femur and the acetabulum. In addition, there is no large-scale bone destruction or significant bone defect, though a small amount of soft tissue swelling is suspected.
For the white blood cell tracer scan (Indium-111-labeled leukocyte scan), an area of increased radiotracer uptake (“hot spot”) is present around the hip prosthesis, suggesting an active infection or inflammatory process. This localized accumulation of labeled leukocytes is typically consistent with periprosthetic infection.
Considering the patient’s advanced age, hip prosthesis pain, past urinary tract infection history, surgical history, elevated laboratory inflammatory markers, and imaging findings (X-ray indicating loosening and altered bone structure around the prosthesis, plus “hot spot” areas on the leukocyte scan), the most likely diagnosis is: Right Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI).
With a clear infected focus (bacterial culture results from hip joint aspiration) and clinical manifestations, the diagnosis is relatively certain. In such conditions, hip aspiration or surgical sampling for bacterial culture is commonly performed to further confirm the diagnosis.
Disclaimer:
This report is provided as a reference based on the available medical information and does not replace in-person consultation or professional medical advice. In case of further questions or any change in condition, please seek prompt medical attention or consult a professional healthcare service.
Urosepsis leading to infected total hip replacement
