Grade III Acromioclavicular joint separation

Clinical Cases 26.03.2007
Scan Image
Section: Musculoskeletal system
Case Type: Clinical Cases
Patient: 37 years, male
Authors: Seco M., Graça B., Canelas A., Rebelo E.
icon
Details
icon
AI Report

Clinical History

A 37-year-old man came to our urgency department with shoulder pain following a fall on the point of the shoulder. Radiographs demonstrated widening of the acromioclavicular joint and an increased coracoclavicular distance.

Imaging Findings

A 37-year-old man, who was playing football, had a fall on the point of the shoulder. After that he complained of severe pain and limited mobility of the shoulder girdle. Clinical examination demonstrated the classic «piano key sign» (visible step-off where the clavicle can be pushed down but will spring back when pressure is released). He made radiographs (anteroposterior projection of shoulder and lateral projection of scapula) that showed widening of the acromioclavicular joint (1cm) and increased coracoclavicular distance (2cm). The diagnosis of grade III acromioclavicular separation was made (acromioclavicular dislocation).

Discussion

Acromioclavicular separation is usually the result of a fall on the outstretched arm or point of the shoulder (1). Radiographs of a normal acromioclavicular (AC) joint show the inferior margins of the acromion and clavicle forming a continuous line or arc across the joint. Traumatic injury disrupts the relatively weaker AC ligament before the relatively stronger coracoclavicular ligaments, resulting in a predictable pattern of injury that is described by a three-stage grading system (Tossi grades). A grade 1 AC injury is an AC joint sprain without gross disruption of the AC joint. Radiographs may be normal or may show mild AC joint laxity with minimal subluxation. A grade 2 AC injury consists of complete disruption of the AC ligaments with intact coracoclavicular ligaments. Radiographs reveal widening of the AC joint, but a normal coracoclavicular distance. A grade 3 AC injury consists of complete disruption of both the AC and coracoclavicular ligaments (2). Passive inferior traction on the arm may reveal or help upgrade an AC injury that is not apparent without traction (3). Useful rules of thumb are that the AC joint space is usually no more than 5 mm wide and coracoclavicular distance is usually no wider than 11 to 13 mm. Although these numbers are worth remembering as useful guidelines, other factors such as clinical findings and a 50% difference between the two sides are also important (2). These injuries are treated conservatively in cases of grade I or II acromioclavicular joint separation, and surgically in many cases of grade Ill acromioclavicular joint separation. However, surgical connection of a grade Ill acromioclavicular joint separation is controversial, and many surgeons prefer closed treatment methods (3). Finally, the AC joint may appear widened by erosion of the distal clavicle because of rheumatoid arthritis, hiperparathyroidism, infection and traumatic osteolysis but clinical correlation usually leads to the correct diagnosis.

Differential Diagnosis List

Grade III acromioclavicular joint separation.

Final Diagnosis

Grade III acromioclavicular joint separation.

Liscense

Figures

Antero-Posterior View of the Shoulder

icon
Antero-Posterior View of the Shoulder

Lateral View of the Scapula

icon
Lateral View of the Scapula