Six month history of swelling and pain on the dorso-medial aspect of right mid foot.
The boy presented with a six month history of swelling and pain on the dorso-medial aspect of his right mid foot. The swelling had increased in size and was not associated with trauma. On examination there was a well-defined 1cm x 1cm swelling on the medial aspect of the right foot with no overlying skin changes. Plain AP and oblique radiography revealed an accessory well corticated ossicle adjacent to the medial cuneiform bone. Surgical excision of the bone was subsequently performed and the patient made an uneventful recovery with resolution of symptomology.
Numerous accessory bones and ossification centres in the foot and ankle have been described. In the majority of cases these represent incidental findings on radiographs and do not cause symptomology (1). Occasionally these ossicles can become painful due to fracture, degenerative changes, avascular necrosis, and irritation or impingement of adjacent soft tissue (2), or can themselves be mistaken for fractures of adjacent normal bones. The average age of ossification of the medial cuneiform is at two years (3). Bilateral bipartite medial cuneiforms have been reported as an incidental finding on CT scan whilst investigating a fractured intermediate cuneiform (4); however these were not symptomatic. Discriminating between normal skeletal development (including normal variants) and skeletal pathology can be a challenge. An accessory well corticated medial cuneiform ossicle must not be mistaken for a fracture especially if there is pain. An awareness of possible anatomic variants is essential to improve correct diagnostic evaluation
Accessory medial cuneiform
On the X-ray of the dorsal-medial midfoot region of the right foot, there is an additional bone fragment (or osseous separation) near the medial cuneiform. This fragment displays a clear, well-defined cortical margin, with no obvious fracture line or sharp cortical disruption noted. No significant swelling of the adjacent soft tissue is observed; however, given the patient’s slight pain and swelling, further clinical evaluation is recommended.
Considering the patient’s age (15 years), the location of the accessory bone fragment near the medial cuneiform, along with its mature cortical structure and long-standing symptoms, the most likely diagnosis is: Bipartite Medial Cuneiform with Local Symptoms.
If the patient reports significant pain or if imaging findings remain unclear, further CT or MRI could be considered to evaluate bone and soft tissue conditions and rule out other occult fractures or pathologies.
1. Conservative Treatment and Recommendations:
2. Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Exercises:
3. Surgical Indication:
4. Special Considerations:
Disclaimer: This report is based on the current medical imaging and clinical information for reference only and does not replace an in-person consultation or professional medical advice. Please consult a qualified physician or medical institution for specific diagnosis and treatment.
Accessory medial cuneiform