A young girl with a retained glass foreign body that lodged in her left leg and remained there for 3 weeks. It was not investigated on initial presentation and on review later. This lead to a wound infection and repeated attendance to general practitioner and at accident and emergency.
A 20-year-old girl presented to minor injuries unit 10 days after injury to her left leg whilst on a holiday. The patient accidentally fell on a broken glass piece in a pub, which resulted in a laceration to her left leg. She attended the nearest accident and emergency, where the laceration was sutured but did not have any radiological investigation on this occasion. After one week of returning from the holiday patient attended the nearest treatment centre to have the sutures taken out, the district nurse while removing the sutures noticed that the wound was inflamed and tender. The patient was seen by the general practitioner and treated with antibiotics suspecting an infected haematoma. After 3 days, the patient presented to the local minor injuries unit where she was examined and was discharged with a reassurance that it might be a reaction to sutures or resolving haematoma. Though there was a suspicion of retained foreign body, she did not have any imaging. She presented again to the minor injuries unit after 20 days from the original injury, complaining of a lump and redness, but no pain. Patient had an x-ray of the site, which showed a curved glass piece 3 x 1 cm and was about 1 cm deep into the tissues (Figure 1 and 2). The wound was explored and the glass foreign body taken out intact, she was sent home with antibiotics and advised to follow up with the general practitioner.
Glass, metal and wood are the commonest foreign bodies associated with soft tissue injuries of extremities. Many simple investigations are available to detect foreign bodies in the body. It is very important to elicit a good history of the injury and the nature of foreign body involved, as this can assist in deciding the most appropriate investigation to detect it. The most common investigation is an x-ray. Metallic and glass foreign bodies can be easily detected on a roentgenogram, but detecting wood, plastic and organic material can sometimes be difficult as they are not sufficiently radio opaque. However, depending on the type and the duration, other imaging methods like ultrasound scan, computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used. Higher imaging techniques like CT and MRI scans not only help in detecting the foreign body but also help in identifying any soft tissue damaged caused and help in surgical exploration. There are many legal implications of missing a simple diagnosis especially in cases where a common investigation can aid in diagnosis. In the current day of fund deprived health organisations, a lawsuit can be very detrimental hence, doctors should be cautious and should have a low threshold for investigating such cases preferably on first presentation.
Missed glass foreign body (3cm) in the leg.
Based on the provided X-ray of the left lower leg, a high-density shadow can be seen in the local soft tissue, presenting as irregular fragments. Considering the patient’s history of trauma, a retained glass foreign body is highly suspected. The soft tissue margins may show mild swelling, indicating a potential inflammatory or infective reaction. The overall continuity of the bone structure (including the tibia and fibula) is relatively preserved, with no definite fracture lines or significant bone destruction observed.
Combining the patient’s age (20 years old), the history of left lower limb trauma with retained glass foreign body, recent recurrent infections, local pain, and the X-ray findings, the most likely final diagnosis is:
If there are still uncertainties regarding the nature of the foreign body or the condition of the soft tissue, further confirmation can be obtained through ultrasound or CT to determine the exact location of the foreign body and the extent of surrounding tissue damage.
Once the foreign body is removed and the infection is under control, progressive rehabilitation may be initiated. The following is based on the FITT-VP principles (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type, Progression) for reference:
Throughout the rehabilitation process, local pain, redness, or discharge should be closely monitored. If any abnormality occurs, promptly seek medical attention and adjust the rehabilitation plan accordingly.
Disclaimer:
This report is based on the preliminary analysis of the provided clinical and imaging information. It is for reference only and cannot replace an in-person consultation or professional medical advice. If you have any questions or changes in condition, please seek medical attention or professional guidance promptly.
Missed glass foreign body (3cm) in the leg.